Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should the parliamentary elections in India be held every three years as against five years at present?

Arguments :
I. No. This will enhance wastage of money and resources.
II. Yes. This will help the voters to change non-performing representatives without much delay.
III. No. The elected representatives will not have enough time to settle and concentrate on developmental activities.
  • 1None is strong
  • 2Only I and II are strong
  • 3Only II and III are strong
  • 4Only I and III are strong
Answer:- 1
Explanation:-

Solution:
The election process entails exorbitant expenditure. So, holding elections very often will surely lead to wastage of money and resources. Thus, I holds strong. Also, the elected representatives need a considerable period of time to implement their policies and also convince the voters of their working. So, III holds strong while II does not.

Post your Comments

Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.

Test
Classes
E-Book